After having to qualify to World Cup 2010, Reinaldo Rueda has become the hero of many hondurenios. He has also gained support from the media, the federation and players. Above, has been nominated for hondurenia nationality for outstanding contribution to the country. Without doubt, we all thank you. But on the other hand, I think that things have been exaggerated to say Callejas who are considering the idea to keep him as national coach until 2014. Without wishing to offend anyone, my opinion is that we are rushing too much to think about in 2014 without even considering other technicians, and possibly be taking a very emotional decision without considering several aspects that should influence their continuity.
would have happened if the U.S. gets no such Bornstein goal in the last minute against Costa Rica? Do you think we would be asking Rueda until 2014? As a goal may make the difference in a plan of at least five Anios? If we look coldly, much of the excitement is because the classification was achieved. But considering that a goal would have changed our way of thinking, I believe that we are not thinking with the head but with the heart. We should be less emotional and more cold when making decisions.
What would happen if the world plays Honduras played three games before visiting Mexico, cowardly and afraid, and went home with no points and no goals maybe, or just one or two? At least wait to see how it goes in the world.
In the final round, Honduras had 16 points from 30 at stake - a yield of 53%. If we follow the same, roughly means that every other game we play, we win one and lose one. Tie worth five years old, with results like these? Maybe we can do better with de los Cobos, and Guimaraes, or the same primitive or Nahum Espinoza or otherwise. I do not think we should close with one technician and we analyze the results better.
What if Alexis Mendoza wants to "overcome" and promoted to technical director instead of technical assistance, and decides to run another country? Rueda managed to improve, stay the same, or worse with other technical assistance? If we assume the worse, because we take the risk from now? And if we assume that will remain the same or better, so why not put a Umanzor, for example, or other Honduran coach instead of Mendoza to take more experience? I think it's not so easy to prevent what happened in the next five Anios and it is too early to think about it. I hope nobody
malinteprete my comments as constructive criticism is aimed at finding the best solution for Honduras. If you still have to support wheel. However, regardless of who is the technician, decisions must be taken coldly and considering the factors that actually do matter, and not be guided by emotions or political expediency. All that said, we are happy to have qualified for the World Cup!
0 comments:
Post a Comment